PuaHate Random

Registrations Closed  Banned?

Reply
Eyes too close together = horrible for women Thread Tools Search Thread
  #1  
03-30-2013, 04:14 AM
LooksMasterRaceStatus
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 399




__________________
5"10 - SW: 73kg (Nov 2012) CW: 63kg (1 April 2013)
GW: 58kg
GW2: 53kg
UGW: 50kg






  #2  
03-30-2013, 04:17 AM
Shill's Avatar
Shill
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 4,695


She's still beautiful.

It is a death sentence for men, however.

  #3  
03-30-2013, 04:22 AM
LooksMasterRaceStatus
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 399


Quote:
Originally Posted by Shill View Post
She's still beautiful.

It is a death sentence for men, however.
I agree but others on here don't seem to.



__________________
5"10 - SW: 73kg (Nov 2012) CW: 63kg (1 April 2013)
GW: 58kg
GW2: 53kg
UGW: 50kg
  #4  
03-30-2013, 04:22 AM
colez's Avatar
colez
Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Jet setting around the world
Posts: 6,030


Quote:
Originally Posted by Shill View Post
She's still beautiful.

It is a death sentence for men, however.
It's a death sentence if you want to be a faggy male model with no sex appeal or if you want to look like a girl. It's hard to look dominant with wide set eyes. Being able to look dominant is massive in sexual attraction




Wide set eyes are a death sentence for males most of the time. Ideal is neutral/normal looking







  #5  
03-30-2013, 04:26 AM
Shill's Avatar
Shill
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 4,695


Quote:
Originally Posted by colez View Post
It's a death sentence if you want to be a faggy male model with no sex appeal or if you want to look like a girl




Wide set eyes are a death sentence for males most of the time. Ideal is neutral/normal looking
Wide-set eyes = everything. Lono can back me up on this.













  #6  
03-30-2013, 04:29 AM
LooksMasterRaceStatus
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 399


Also I wanted to say this in another thread, I might make one about it, but - people here are wrong about long philtrums being bad.

The philtrum length isn't what's important, it's only bad if it's massive like Bruce Willis's. And even then it's not so bad. What's important is how far the philtrum protrudes. I think people here are confused because long philtrums are very often accompanied by protrusion... but it is not always the case.



Horrible philtrum... it gets complicated when you consider her upper lip but her philtrum itself is horrible, the protrusion is very unappealing looking.



Acceptable philtrum

I could go on and find photos of models with long but straight philtrums, like what Cara has.



__________________
5"10 - SW: 73kg (Nov 2012) CW: 63kg (1 April 2013)
GW: 58kg
GW2: 53kg
UGW: 50kg
  #7  
03-30-2013, 04:30 AM
Compliicated
Guest
 
Posts: n/a


Quote:
Originally Posted by LooksMasterRaceStatus View Post
I agree but others on here don't seem to.

He looks borderline retarded







  #8  
03-30-2013, 04:31 AM
LooksMasterRaceStatus
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 399


Quote:
Originally Posted by colez View Post
It's a death sentence if you want to be a faggy male model with no sex appeal or if you want to look like a girl. It's hard to look dominant with wide set eyes. Being able to look dominant is massive in sexual attraction




Wide set eyes are a death sentence for males most of the time. Ideal is neutral/normal looking
Maybe for sexual attraction to women, but aesthetically speaking they are horrible.

Lol colez how do you know what sexual appeal is to women if you're not a woman?

__________________
5"10 - SW: 73kg (Nov 2012) CW: 63kg (1 April 2013)
GW: 58kg
GW2: 53kg
UGW: 50kg
  #9  
03-30-2013, 04:34 AM
Incelftw's Avatar
Incelftw
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,595


Quote:
Originally Posted by LooksMasterRaceStatus View Post
I agree but others on here don't seem to.



  #10  
03-30-2013, 04:41 AM
Shill's Avatar
Shill
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 4,695


Quote:
Originally Posted by LooksMasterRaceStatus View Post
Also I wanted to say this in another thread, I might make one about it, but - people here are wrong about long philtrums being bad.

The philtrum length isn't what's important, it's only bad if it's massive like Bruce Willis's. And even then it's not so bad. What's important is how far the philtrum protrudes. I think people here are confused because long philtrums are very often accompanied by protrusion... but it is not always the case.

Horrible philtrum... it gets complicated when you consider her upper lip but her philtrum itself is horrible, the protrusion is very unappealing looking.

Acceptable philtrum

I could go on and find photos of models with long but straight philtrums, like what Cara has.
I would say long philtrums are bad in most cases, but obviously facial balance is key and long philtrums work in some people.

I think you may be referring to the shape of the philtrum and upper lip in profile. It's ideal to have a concave upper lip. The worst is to have a convex upper lip, which makes you look like a chimp. Short philtrums -- for whatever reason -- seem to be more likely to produce attractive concave upper lips.

Short philtrum/concave upper lip:



Long philtrum/convex upper lip:









  #11  
03-30-2013, 04:53 AM
lovepua's Avatar
lovepua
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,970


Quote:
Originally Posted by LooksMasterRaceStatus View Post
10/10

__________________
  #12  
03-30-2013, 04:54 AM
Compliicated
Guest
 
Posts: n/a


Simon nessman is beast. A real 10/10. I don't get why people call him beta. Maybe his personality is beta but his bone structure is masculine as hell, mixed with a few feminine traits which makes him a 10/10.



  #13  
03-30-2013, 04:58 AM
Shill's Avatar
Shill
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 4,695


Quote:
Originally Posted by Compliicated View Post
Simon nessman is beast. A real 10/10. I don't get why people call him beta. Maybe his personality is beta but his bone structure is masculine as hell, mixed with a few feminine traits which makes him a 10/10.

Yeah, he is a genetic god. His face is pretty much flawless (only real problem is his hair, which can be easily managed).

He also has a really nice body -- 6'3'' with thick, massive bones and a mesomorphic physique with perfect muscle tone.







Easily 8-inch wrists.







  #14  
03-30-2013, 05:01 AM
LooksMasterRaceStatus
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 399


Yes that's what I meant.

Also I'm not sure about this but I think some men might even be better looking with longer philtrums, like Nessman there.

Also a long philtrum on women doesn't seem to matter much either, and in fact long or longer philtrums on women might even make them better looking, although the proportions and 'harmony' of the face is much more important for them compared to men, I think. But I don't look at men much.

It is strange, I really like short chins on women, but for a chin to be short the jaw/ramus also has to be short otherwise you get a big albeit rounded (because of bodyfat) jaw like what men have. And if the chin is short the philtrum can't be too short because then you get a long midface (defining the midface as pupils to nose tip). Which is why I think long philtrums are okay on women, because it allows them a shorter chin. The philtrum equation in women seems even more delicate than it is with men, because men have bigger chins, and even though big chins are bad on everyone, men seem to have more leeway with them because they seem sexually dimorphic like in the colez pic.

__________________
5"10 - SW: 73kg (Nov 2012) CW: 63kg (1 April 2013)
GW: 58kg
GW2: 53kg
UGW: 50kg
  #15  
03-30-2013, 05:04 AM
pmf's Avatar
pmf
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,055


i dont get the colez hate on nessman either

  #16  
03-30-2013, 05:07 AM
SnowTroll's Avatar
SnowTroll
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 2,335


They are worse on men, why? Because women have a make-up technique to give an illusion of wider set eyes by simply painting the inner corners white and extending the outer corners with eye liner. They also have bigger eyes overall.

If you have close-set and deep-set small eyes, then you are f*cked.

The guy colez posted looks like a mouse, hardly sexually dimorphic. He would look much stronger and masculine if his eyes were wider set and bigger.







  #17  
03-30-2013, 05:07 AM
LooksMasterRaceStatus
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 399


Quote:
Originally Posted by Compliicated View Post
Simon nessman is beast. A real 10/10. I don't get why people call him beta. Maybe his personality is beta but his bone structure is masculine as hell, mixed with a few feminine traits which makes him a 10/10.

Lips too big, chin too narrow, jaw angle too circular, and there's something wrong with his cheekbones but I don't know how to say what. His head looks too long and cheeks too narrow or something, has that caucasian long head issue.

__________________
5"10 - SW: 73kg (Nov 2012) CW: 63kg (1 April 2013)
GW: 58kg
GW2: 53kg
UGW: 50kg
  #18  
03-30-2013, 05:55 AM
Chincel's Avatar
Chincel
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Incel Land
Posts: 8,298


Marko Jaric's eyes really bring down his looks, I don't like Nessman in some profile shots, he looks nerdy.

__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Waking Up View Post
This x1000. Many members here would kill just to be Chincel. Just the ability to stick your dick into something reasonable.
I'm not crazy, I'm just too self-aware.
  #19  
03-30-2013, 08:49 AM
lono's Avatar
lono
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 7,302


Quote:
Originally Posted by colez View Post
It's a death sentence if you want to be a faggy male model with no sex appeal or if you want to look like a girl. It's hard to look dominant with wide set eyes. Being able to look dominant is massive in sexual attraction




Wide set eyes are a death sentence for males most of the time. Ideal is neutral/normal looking
who looks more dominant











  #20  
03-30-2013, 09:48 AM
Shit Taco's Avatar
Shit Taco
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Why so shitty?
Posts: 1,412


Why did I think there would be pictures of girls in this thread?

Jesus, you guys are fags.

__________________
Die
Die
Die, my darling
  #21  
03-30-2013, 09:52 AM
Ffs's Avatar
Ffs
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Gandys place
Posts: 7,426


Even set or slightly wideset are better. Close set eyes = ratlike.

__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chief Beef View Post
My penis is longer than your entire face.
  #22  
03-30-2013, 10:01 AM
Genetics's Avatar
Genetics
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Sikk physique UGL
Posts: 4,833












  #23  
03-30-2013, 10:03 AM
Ffs's Avatar
Ffs
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Gandys place
Posts: 7,426


Close set eyes look retarded everytime. I cant think of an example when close set looks better than even set/wideset.

__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chief Beef View Post
My penis is longer than your entire face.
  #24  
03-30-2013, 10:04 AM
Genetics's Avatar
Genetics
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Sikk physique UGL
Posts: 4,833


Quote:
Originally Posted by Ffs View Post
Close set eyes look retarded everytime. I cant think of an example when close set looks better than even set/wideset.
looks funny because of how robus his face and skull structure is like the guy cole posted yet they have small beta rat eyes

  #25  
03-30-2013, 10:07 AM
fedfan's Avatar
fedfan
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,112


Quote:
Originally Posted by Genetics View Post


I don't think the closeness of his eyes are the only thing making him look ugly/retarded, I think the shape and size of them is the main reason. They are way too small, you hardly see any sclera.







  #26  
03-30-2013, 10:46 AM
Peanuts's Avatar
Peanuts
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 7,065


Even set is best set. (for men)

  #27  
03-30-2013, 01:23 PM
RemusGod's Avatar
RemusGod
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 37


Colez is goddamn retarded. Nessman is the epitome of the 10/10 male bone structure. He absolutely maxed out in all of the positive jewsthetics, besides hair. And for anyone calling his non-masculine look at his unreal chin projection.



And you ALWAYS want large horizontal eye length. Period. Just not large vertical eye length. Otherwise it will disrupt your facial fifths. The distance between your eyes should be one eye length. Large eyes can accommodate large eye spacing and shorten the midface.



Colez = jock loving ignoramus

  #28  
04-13-2013, 12:15 PM
Magic 8-Ball
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 4,429


Yes - definitely.







  #29  
04-13-2013, 01:04 PM
sodiniwasright's Avatar
sodiniwasright
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,917


I read the whole thread on my phone without realizing it had been pumped by a bot.

Stimm loled at the fact that it was supposed to be a women thread and it still was taken over by male models




  #30  
04-13-2013, 01:08 PM
Peanuts's Avatar
Peanuts
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 7,065


Eyes a bit too close together doesn't really mean much in the real world. People usually don't have the options to reject someone based on a single feature alone, unless it's a horrific deformity.

By the way, imo Lana's bigger problem is the width of her eyes. So is Jared Leto's. And Osment's. Beady eyes are not attractive.

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

As Hated By Yahoo Jezebel Something Awful Man Boobz